AMD Radeon R9 280
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Radeon R9 280
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

237
Place in performance rating
60
no data
Value for money (0-100)
43.19
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Vega
Tahiti
Code name
Vega 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
4 March 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
14 August 2017 (4 years ago)
$279
Launch price (MSRP)
$499
$305 (1.1x MSRP)
Price now
$1330 (2.7x MSRP)
reference
Design
no data
10.12
Value for money
16.44
Tahiti
GPU code name
Vega
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1792
Pipelines
4096
no data
Core clock speed
1630 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
4,313 million
Transistor count
12,500 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
200 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
295 Watt
104.5
Texture fill rate
395.8
3,344 gflops
Floating-point performance
13,353 gflops
1792
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4096
933 MHz
Boost clock speed
1546 MHz
4,313 million
Number of transistors
12,500 million
200 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
295 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
275 mm
Length
279 mm
1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
2x 8-pin
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
HBM2
3 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
2048 Bit
1250 MHz
Memory clock speed
945 MHz
240 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
1
Eyefinity
no data
+
HDMI
+
-
DisplayPort support
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is the additional functionality.

-
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
1
LiquidVR
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
1
TressFX
no data
+
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data
+
UVD
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 280 or AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 111 80 68 56 44 26
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 170 118 107 103 72.1 38.9
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 256 167 140 99.5 79.7 51.6
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 348.7 195.5 128 83.7 56.6 29.8
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 241 182 153 140 95.3 48.6
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280

Cheaper ($305 (1.1x MSRP) vs $1330 (2.7x MSRP))

Less power consumption (200 Watt vs 295 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

42.1% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (4096 vs 1792)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 3 GB)

More memory bandwidth (483.8 GB/s vs 240 GB/s)

So, AMD Radeon R9 280 or AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 .

AMD Radeon R9 280 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 280
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon RX Vega 64