AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VS
AMD Radeon R9 M365X
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VS
AMD Radeon R9 M365X

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M365X. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

498
Place in performance rating
543
GCN
Architecture
GCN
Kaveri Spectre
Code name
Tropo
Desktop
Type
Laptop
14 January 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
6 May 2015 (6 years ago)
Kaveri Spectre
GPU code name
Tropo
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M365X based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
640
720 MHz
Core clock speed
900 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
925 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,500 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
37.00
no data
Floating-point performance
1,184 gflops
no data
Compute units
10
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
640
no data
Boost clock speed
925 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
1,500 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M365X.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M365X can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1125 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
+
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M365X, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Eyefinity
1

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M365X is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1
+
DirectCompute 5.0
no data
no data
Zero Core
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M365X. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
DirectX
DirectX® 12
no data
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M365X graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or AMD Radeon R9 M365X good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon R9 M365X
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon R9 M365X
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon R9 M365X
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon R9 M365X
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon R9 M365X
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M365X

0.72% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (640 vs 384)

So, AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or AMD Radeon R9 M365X?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 M365X .

AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) versus AMD Radeon R9 M365X performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 M365X