AMD Radeon R7 250
VS
AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R7 250
VS
AMD Cedar

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Cedar. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

599
Place in performance rating
not rated
22.79
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Oland
Code name
Cedar
Desktop
Type
Desktop
1 October 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
no data
$89
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$117 (1.3x MSRP)
Price now
$17.81
reference
Design
no data
1.00
Value for money
no data
Oland XT
GPU code name
Cedar
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Cedar based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
80
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
950 million
Transistor count
292 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
25.20
Texture fill rate
no data
716.8 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
80
1050 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
950 million
Number of transistors
292 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Cedar.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
no data
168 mm
Length
no data
N/A
Supplementary power connectors
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Cedar can be seen in this section.

DDR3, GDDR5
Memory type
no data
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1150 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
72 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Cedar, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Connectors
no data
+
HDMI
no data
-
DisplayPort support
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Cedar is the additional functionality.

+
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
-
HD3D
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
-
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Cedar. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Cedar graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 250 or AMD Cedar good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Cedar
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Cedar
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Cedar
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Cedar
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Cedar
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250

6.53% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $117 (1.3x MSRP))

So, AMD Radeon R7 250 or AMD Cedar?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 250 .

AMD Radeon R7 250 versus AMD Cedar performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 250
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cedar