AMD FirePro W6150M
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 620
AMD FirePro W6150M
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 620

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD FirePro W6150M and Intel UHD Graphics 620. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

537
Place in performance rating
639
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Gen. 9.5
no data
Code name
Kaby Lake GT2
no data
Type
Laptop
12 November 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
1 September 2017 (4 years ago)
$299
Price now
$706
3.30
Value for money
1.06
Saturn
GPU code name
Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD FirePro W6150M and Intel UHD Graphics 620 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
192
1075 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
no data
Transistor count
189 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
51.60
Texture fill rate
27.60
1,651 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
768
Pipelines / CUDA cores
24
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
2,080 million
Number of transistors
189 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD FirePro W6150M and Intel UHD Graphics 620.

MXM-B (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD FirePro W6150M and Intel UHD Graphics 620 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR3/DDR4
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
5500 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
88 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD FirePro W6150M and Intel UHD Graphics 620, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between AMD FirePro W6150M and Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD FirePro W6150M and Intel UHD Graphics 620. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

no data
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD FirePro W6150M and Intel UHD Graphics 620 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD FirePro W6150M or Intel UHD Graphics 620 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Intel UHD Graphics 620
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Intel UHD Graphics 620 29.2 13.5 10.2
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Intel UHD Graphics 620 31.2 10.7
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD FirePro W6150M

0.91% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($299 vs $706)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 620

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (32 GB vs 4 GB)

So, AMD FirePro W6150M or Intel UHD Graphics 620?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W6150M .

AMD FirePro W6150M versus Intel UHD Graphics 620 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W6150M
5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 620