AMD Cedar
VS
AMD FirePro V7900
AMD Cedar
VS
AMD FirePro V7900

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro V7900. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
435
no data
Value for money (0-100)
13.10
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Cedar
Code name
Cayman
Desktop
Type
Workstation
no data
Release date
24 May 2011 (10 years ago)
$17.81
Price now
$157
no data
Value for money
3.86
Cedar
GPU code name
Cayman
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro V7900 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

80
Pipelines
1280
no data
Core clock speed
725 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
2,640 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
58.00
no data
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1280
292 million
Number of transistors
2,640 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
151 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro V7900.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
279 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro V7900 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro V7900, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
no data
StereoOutput3D
1
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
4

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro V7900. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro V7900 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or AMD FirePro V7900 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD FirePro V7900
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD FirePro V7900
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD FirePro V7900
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD FirePro V7900
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD FirePro V7900
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $157)

Advantages of AMD FirePro V7900

13.73% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1280 vs 80)

So, AMD Cedar or AMD FirePro V7900?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro V7900 .

AMD Cedar versus AMD FirePro V7900 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cedar
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro V7900