AMD Cayman
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
AMD Cayman
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cayman and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
581
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Cayman
Code name
Coffee Lake GT3e
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
10 July 2019 (2 years ago)
$17.44
Price now
no data
Cayman
GPU code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cayman and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1536
Pipelines
384
no data
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2,640 million
Transistor count
no data
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
50.40
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
2,640 million
Number of transistors
no data
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cayman and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cayman and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cayman and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between AMD Cayman and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cayman and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cayman and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cayman or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cayman
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cayman
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cayman
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cayman
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cayman
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cayman

More pipelines (1536 vs 384)

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

6.12% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cayman or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 .

AMD Cayman versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cayman
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645