AeroBox GPU
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
AeroBox GPU
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AeroBox GPU and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
828
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
no data
Code name
GF116
no data
Type
Laptop
13 March 2020 (1 year ago)
Release date
6 December 2011 (10 years ago)
no data
Price now
$55
no data
Value for money
0.26
Kryptos
GPU code name
N13E-GE2
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AeroBox GPU and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
144
no data
Boost Clock
753 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,170 million
16 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
55.16
Texture fill rate
no data
no data
Floating-point performance
253.4 gflops
no data
CUDA cores
Up to 144
896
Pipelines / CUDA cores
144
985 MHz
Boost clock speed
753 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
1,170 million
100 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AeroBox GPU and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M.

IGP
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Laptop size
large
no data
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AeroBox GPU and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
DDR3
8 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
2132 MHz
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
68.22 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AeroBox GPU and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
HDCP
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

The difference between AeroBox GPU and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M is the additional functionality.

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+
no data
3D Blu-Ray
+
no data
DirectX 11
DirectX 11
no data
DirectCompute
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AeroBox GPU and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 API
N/A
OpenGL
4.5
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
1.2
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AeroBox GPU and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AeroBox GPU or NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AeroBox GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Death Stranding (2020) AeroBox GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
F1 2020 (2020) AeroBox GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Gears Tactics (2020) AeroBox GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Doom Eternal (2020) AeroBox GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AeroBox GPU

Finer manufacturing process technology (16 nm vs 40 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 2 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

3.63% faster in synthetic tests

So, AeroBox GPU or NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M .

AeroBox GPU versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AeroBox GPU
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M