AeroBox GPU
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630
AeroBox GPU
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AeroBox GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 630. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
597
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Gen. 9.5
no data
Code name
Comet Lake GT2
no data
Type
Desktop
13 March 2020 (1 year ago)
Release date
1 October 2017 (4 years ago)
no data
Price now
$1009
no data
Value for money
1.00
Kryptos
GPU code name
Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AeroBox GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 630 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
184
no data
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
no data
Transistor count
189 million
16 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55.16
Texture fill rate
26.45
no data
Floating-point performance
460.8 gflops
896
Pipelines / CUDA cores
24
985 MHz
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
189 million
100 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AeroBox GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 630.

IGP
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AeroBox GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 630 can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
System Shared
8 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
2132 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
68.22 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AeroBox GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 630, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between AeroBox GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AeroBox GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 630. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
1.2
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AeroBox GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AeroBox GPU or Intel UHD Graphics 630 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AeroBox GPU
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Death Stranding (2020) AeroBox GPU
Intel UHD Graphics 630
F1 2020 (2020) AeroBox GPU
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gears Tactics (2020) AeroBox GPU
Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
Doom Eternal (2020) AeroBox GPU
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AeroBox GPU

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630

6.52% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 16 nm)

So, AeroBox GPU or Intel UHD Graphics 630?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics 630 .

AeroBox GPU versus Intel UHD Graphics 630 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AeroBox GPU
5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 630