NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
VS
AMD FirePro M5950
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
VS
AMD FirePro M5950

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD FirePro M5950. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

563
Place in performance rating
572
2.89
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler
Architecture
Terascale 2
GK106
Code name
Whistler
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
23 July 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
13 April 2011 (10 years ago)
$84.95
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$208 (2.4x MSRP)
Price now
$386
0.97
Value for money
0.48
GK106
GPU code name
Whistler-XT
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD FirePro M5950 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

576
Pipelines
480
667 MHz
Core clock speed
725 MHz
2,540 million
Transistor count
716 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
55 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
32.02
Texture fill rate
17.40
768.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
576
Pipelines / CUDA cores
480
2,540 million
Number of transistors
716 million
55 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD FirePro M5950.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
medium sized
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
n/a
no data
Form factor
MXM-A

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD FirePro M5950 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
3000 MHz
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
48.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD FirePro M5950, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
1.2
Display Port
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD FirePro M5950 is the additional functionality.

+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Display Management
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD FirePro M5950. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.5
OpenGL
4.4
+
Vulkan
no data
5
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD FirePro M5950 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M or AMD FirePro M5950 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
AMD FirePro M5950
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
AMD FirePro M5950
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
AMD FirePro M5950
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
AMD FirePro M5950
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
AMD FirePro M5950
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

0.36% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($208 (2.4x MSRP) vs $386)

More pipelines (576 vs 480)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

Advantages of AMD FirePro M5950

Less power consumption (35 Watt vs 55 Watt)

More memory bandwidth (57 GB/s vs 48.0 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K2100M or AMD FirePro M5950?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2100M .

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M versus AMD FirePro M5950 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro M5950