AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
563
no data
Value for money (0-100)
2.89
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
Cypress
Code name
GK106
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
23 July 2013 (8 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$84.95
$12.72
Price now
$208 (2.4x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.97
Cypress
GPU code name
GK106
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1600
Pipelines
576
no data
Core clock speed
667 MHz
2,154 million
Transistor count
2,540 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
32.02
no data
Floating-point performance
768.4 gflops
1600
Pipelines / CUDA cores
576
2,154 million
Number of transistors
2,540 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
55 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M.

no data
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
48.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Display Port
1.2

Technologies

The difference between AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+
no data
3D Vision Pro
+
no data
Mosaic
+
no data
nView Display Management
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12
4.4
OpenGL
4.5
no data
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
5
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cypress or NVIDIA Quadro K2100M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cypress

Cheaper ($12.72 vs $208 (2.4x MSRP))

More pipelines (1600 vs 576)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

6.41% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cypress or NVIDIA Quadro K2100M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2100M .

AMD Cypress versus NVIDIA Quadro K2100M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cypress
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K2100M