NVIDIA Quadro K2000
VS
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
VS
AMD FirePro W4100

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and AMD FirePro W4100. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

532
Place in performance rating
534
12.99
Value for money (0-100)
6.55
Kepler
Architecture
GCN
GK107
Code name
Cape Verde
Workstation
Type
Workstation
1 March 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
2 October 2015 (6 years ago)
$599
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$1172 (2x MSRP)
Price now
$212
0.23
Value for money
4.56
GK107
GPU code name
Cape Verde
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and AMD FirePro W4100 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
512
954 MHz
Core clock speed
630 MHz
1,270 million
Transistor count
1,500 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
51 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
30.53
Texture fill rate
20.16
732.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
645.1 gflops
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
1,270 million
Number of transistors
1,500 million
51 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
400 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and AMD FirePro W4100.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
202 mm
Length
171 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
low profile / half length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and AMD FirePro W4100 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
4000 MHz
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
64 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and AMD FirePro W4100, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and AMD FirePro W4100 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
PowerPlay
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and AMD FirePro W4100. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and AMD FirePro W4100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K2000 or AMD FirePro W4100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000
AMD FirePro W4100
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000
AMD FirePro W4100
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000
AMD FirePro W4100
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000
AMD FirePro W4100
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000
AMD FirePro W4100
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000

0.43% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of AMD FirePro W4100

Cheaper ($212 vs $1172 (2x MSRP))

More pipelines (512 vs 384)

Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 51 Watt)

More memory bandwidth (72 GB/s vs 64 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K2000 or AMD FirePro W4100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2000 .

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 versus AMD FirePro W4100 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K2000
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W4100
Your Commento.io account has been suspended. Go to the Commento dashboard to resolve this.