NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
VS
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
VS
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

1056
Place in performance rating
979
G8x
Architecture
RV6xx
no data
Code name
M86
no data
Type
Mobile workstation
9 June 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
7 January 2008 (13 years ago)
$66
Price now
no data
0.06
Value for money
no data
G84M
GPU code name
M86-GL
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
120
575 MHz
Core clock speed
600 MHz
no data
Transistor count
378 million
80 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
9.200
Texture fill rate
4.800
73.6 gflops
Floating-point performance
144 gflops
32
Pipelines / CUDA cores
120
289 million
Number of transistors
378 million
20 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700.

MXM-HE
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
large
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3, GDDR2
Memory type
DDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
700 MHz
Memory clock speed
700 MHz
22.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
22.4 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 is the additional functionality.

no data
PCI-E 2.0
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

no data
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
no data
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M or ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

0.4% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (55 nm vs 80 nm)

So, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M or ATI Mobility FireGL V5700?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 .

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M versus ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI Mobility FireGL V5700