NVIDIA Tesla C2075
VS
AMD FirePro W8000
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
VS
AMD FirePro W8000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and AMD FirePro W8000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

345
Place in performance rating
338
no data
Value for money (0-100)
6.98
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GF110
Code name
Tahiti
Workstation
Type
Desktop
25 July 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
14 June 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,599
$750
Price now
$550 (0.3x MSRP)
1.73
Value for money
2.49
GF110
GPU code name
Tahiti
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and AMD FirePro W8000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

448
Pipelines
1792
574 MHz
Core clock speed
900 MHz
3,000 million
Transistor count
4,313 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
247 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
32.14
Texture fill rate
100.8
1,030.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
448
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1792
3,000 million
Number of transistors
4,313 million
247 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
350 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and AMD FirePro W8000.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
248 mm
Length
279 mm
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and AMD FirePro W8000 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
6 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
3132 MHz
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
150.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
176 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and AMD FirePro W8000, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
no data
StereoOutput3D
1
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
4

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and AMD FirePro W8000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and AMD FirePro W8000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Tesla C2075 or AMD FirePro W8000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Tesla C2075
AMD FirePro W8000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Tesla C2075
AMD FirePro W8000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Tesla C2075
AMD FirePro W8000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Tesla C2075
AMD FirePro W8000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Tesla C2075
AMD FirePro W8000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla C2075

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 4 GB)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W8000

0.41% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($550 (0.3x MSRP) vs $750)

More pipelines (1792 vs 448)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (225 Watt vs 247 Watt)

More memory bandwidth (176 GB/s vs 150.3 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Tesla C2075 or AMD FirePro W8000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W8000 .

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 versus AMD FirePro W8000 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Tesla C2075
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W8000