NVIDIA Quadro P2000
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M330
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M330

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon R5 M330. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

194
Place in performance rating
813
19.51
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GP106
Code name
Exo
Workstation
Type
Laptop
6 February 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
7 May 2015 (6 years ago)
$585
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$1307 (2.2x MSRP)
Price now
no data
9.17
Value for money
no data
GP106
GPU code name
Exo Pro DDR3
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1024
Pipelines
320
1076 MHz
Core clock speed
1030 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1030 MHz
4,400 million
Transistor count
690 million
16 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
18 Watt
94.72
Texture fill rate
20.60
3,031 gflops
Floating-point performance
659.2 gflops
no data
Compute units
5
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
1480 MHz
Boost clock speed
1030 MHz
4,400 million
Number of transistors
690 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
18 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon R5 M330.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
201 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3
5 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
160 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
7008 MHz
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
140.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon R5 M330, the size and number of monitors.

4x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon R5 M330. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
+
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
5.0
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 or AMD Radeon R5 M330 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P2000
AMD Radeon R5 M330
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P2000
AMD Radeon R5 M330
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P2000
AMD Radeon R5 M330
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P2000
AMD Radeon R5 M330
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P2000
AMD Radeon R5 M330
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P2000

30.9% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1024 vs 320)

Finer manufacturing process technology (16 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (5 GB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (140.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 M330

Less power consumption (18 Watt vs 75 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro P2000 or AMD Radeon R5 M330?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro P2000 .

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 versus AMD Radeon R5 M330 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro P2000
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R5 M330