NVIDIA Quadro M2000
VS
T400 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
VS
T400 Mobile

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and T400 Mobile. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

303
Place in performance rating
not rated
15.21
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
GM206
Code name
no data
Workstation
Type
no data
8 April 2016 (5 years ago)
Release date
no data
$437.75
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$680 (1.6x MSRP)
Price now
no data
6.14
Value for money
no data
GM206
GPU code name
TU117
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and T400 Mobile based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

768
Pipelines
no data
796 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
2,940 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
55.82
Texture fill rate
79.80
1,812 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
768
Pipelines / CUDA cores
896
1163 MHz
Boost clock speed
1425 MHz
2,940 million
Number of transistors
4,700 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
18 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and T400 Mobile.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
201 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
1" (2.5 cm)
Width
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and T400 Mobile can be seen in this section.

128 Bit
Memory type
GDDR6
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
6612 MHz
Memory clock speed
10 GB/s
no data
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and T400 Mobile, the size and number of monitors.

DP DP DP DP
Display Connectors
No outputs
4
Number of simultaneous displays
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and T400 Mobile is the additional functionality.

5.2
CUDA
7.5
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Desktop Management
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and T400 Mobile. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
1.2
5
Shader Model
6.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and T400 Mobile graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro M2000 or T400 Mobile good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
T400 Mobile
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
T400 Mobile
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
T400 Mobile
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
T400 Mobile
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2000
T400 Mobile
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M2000

19.41% faster in synthetic tests

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

Advantages of T400 Mobile

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 28 nm)

So, NVIDIA Quadro M2000 or T400 Mobile?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro M2000 .

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 versus T400 Mobile performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro M2000
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score T400 Mobile