NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M255
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M255

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and AMD Radeon R5 M255. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

408
Place in performance rating
854
13.50
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler
Architecture
GCN
GK104
Code name
Topaz
Mobile workstation
Type
Laptop
23 July 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
1 May 2014 (7 years ago)
$1,499
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$323 (0.2x MSRP)
Price now
no data
2.39
Value for money
no data
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU code name
Topaz Pro / Sun
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and AMD Radeon R5 M255 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1152
Pipelines
384
706 MHz
Core clock speed
940 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
940 MHz
3,540 million
Transistor count
1,550 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
100 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
67.78
Texture fill rate
22.56
1,627 gflops
Floating-point performance
721.9 gflops
no data
Compute units
5
1152
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
no data
Boost clock speed
940 MHz
3,540 million
Number of transistors
1,550 million
100 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and AMD Radeon R5 M255.

MXM-B (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
large
Laptop size
no data
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0 x8

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and AMD Radeon R5 M255 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
3200 MHz
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
102.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
16 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and AMD Radeon R5 M255, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
1.2
Display Port
no data
no data
Eyefinity
+

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and AMD Radeon R5 M255 is the additional functionality.

+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Display Management
no data
no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1
no data
PowerPlay
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and AMD Radeon R5 M255. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12
DirectX
DirectX® 11
4.5
OpenGL
4.4
+
Vulkan
no data
5
Shader Model
6.3
1.2
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and AMD Radeon R5 M255 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M or AMD Radeon R5 M255 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
AMD Radeon R5 M255
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
AMD Radeon R5 M255
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
AMD Radeon R5 M255
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
AMD Radeon R5 M255
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
AMD Radeon R5 M255 8.5
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

8.1% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1152 vs 384)

More memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s vs 16 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 M255

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA Quadro K4100M or AMD Radeon R5 M255?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K4100M .

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M versus AMD Radeon R5 M255 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R5 M255