NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
VS
AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
VS
AMD Caicos

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and AMD Caicos. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

725
Place in performance rating
not rated
8.95
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GT200B
Code name
Caicos
Workstation
Type
Desktop
30 March 2009 (12 years ago)
Release date
no data
$799
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$235 (0.3x MSRP)
Price now
$10.38
0.25
Value for money
no data
GT200B
GPU code name
Caicos
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and AMD Caicos based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
160
600 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1,400 million
Transistor count
370 million
55 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
108 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
38.40
Texture fill rate
no data
462.3 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
160
1,400 million
Number of transistors
370 million
108 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and AMD Caicos.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
no data
198 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and AMD Caicos can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
no data
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
256 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1600 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
51.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and AMD Caicos, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and AMD Caicos. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and AMD Caicos graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 or AMD Caicos good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
AMD Caicos
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
AMD Caicos
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
AMD Caicos
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
AMD Caicos
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
AMD Caicos
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

4.59% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (192 vs 160)

Advantages of AMD Caicos

Cheaper ($10.38 vs $235 (0.3x MSRP))

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 or AMD Caicos?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 versus AMD Caicos performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Caicos