NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
VS
NVIDIA NVS 315
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
VS
NVIDIA NVS 315

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA NVS 315. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

725
Place in performance rating
939
8.95
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GT200B
Code name
GF119
Workstation
Type
Desktop
30 March 2009 (12 years ago)
Release date
10 March 2013 (8 years ago)
$799
Launch price (MSRP)
$159
$235 (0.3x MSRP)
Price now
$343 (2.2x MSRP)
0.25
Value for money
0.03
GT200B
GPU code name
GF119
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA NVS 315 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
48
600 MHz
Core clock speed
523 MHz
1,400 million
Transistor count
292 million
55 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
108 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
19 Watt
38.40
Texture fill rate
4.184
462.3 gflops
Floating-point performance
100.4 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
1,400 million
Number of transistors
292 million
108 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
19 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA NVS 315.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
198 mm
Length
145 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA NVS 315 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR3
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1600 MHz
Memory clock speed
1750 MHz
51.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
14 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA NVS 315, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x DMS-59

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA NVS 315. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA NVS 315 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 or NVIDIA NVS 315 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
NVIDIA NVS 315
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
NVIDIA NVS 315
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
NVIDIA NVS 315
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
NVIDIA NVS 315
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
NVIDIA NVS 315
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

1.99% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($235 (0.3x MSRP) vs $343 (2.2x MSRP))

More pipelines (192 vs 48)

More memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 14 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 315

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (19 Watt vs 108 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 or NVIDIA NVS 315?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 versus NVIDIA NVS 315 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score NVIDIA NVS 315