NVIDIA Quadro 2000
VS
AMD Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
VS
AMD Radeon R9 270

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and AMD Radeon R9 270. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

671
Place in performance rating
286
10.74
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GF106
Code name
Curacao
Workstation
Type
Desktop
24 December 2010 (10 years ago)
Release date
13 November 2013 (8 years ago)
$599
Launch price (MSRP)
$179
$89 (0.1x MSRP)
Price now
$269 (1.5x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
0.69
Value for money
6.20
GF106
GPU code name
Curacao
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and AMD Radeon R9 270 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
1280
625 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
no data
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1,170 million
Transistor count
2,800 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
62 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
20.00
Texture fill rate
74.00
480.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
2,368 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1280
no data
Boost clock speed
925 MHz
1,170 million
Number of transistors
2,800 million
62 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and AMD Radeon R9 270.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
178 mm
Length
210 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and AMD Radeon R9 270 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
2600 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
41.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and AMD Radeon R9 270, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
1
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
+

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and AMD Radeon R9 270 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
CrossFire
1
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
+
no data
LiquidVR
1
no data
PowerTune
-
no data
TressFX
1
no data
TrueAudio
+
no data
ZeroCore
-
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
UVD
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and AMD Radeon R9 270. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2
no data
Mantle
-

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and AMD Radeon R9 270 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro 2000 or AMD Radeon R9 270 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
AMD Radeon R9 270
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
AMD Radeon R9 270
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
AMD Radeon R9 270
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
AMD Radeon R9 270
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
AMD Radeon R9 270
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Cheaper ($89 (0.1x MSRP) vs $269 (1.5x MSRP))

Less power consumption (62 Watt vs 150 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 270

15.16% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1280 vs 192)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (179.2 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro 2000 or AMD Radeon R9 270?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 270 .

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 versus AMD Radeon R9 270 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro 2000
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 270