Intel UHD Graphics 615
VS
AMD Cedar
Intel UHD Graphics 615
VS
AMD Cedar

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Cedar. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

615
Place in performance rating
not rated
Gen. 9 Amber Lake
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Amber Lake GT2
Code name
Cedar
Laptop
Type
Desktop
30 August 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
no data
$518
Price now
$17.81
1.97
Value for money
no data
Kaby-Lake GT2
GPU code name
Cedar
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Cedar based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
80
300 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
no data
Transistor count
292 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
25.20
Texture fill rate
no data
24
Pipelines / CUDA cores
80
1000 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
no data
Number of transistors
292 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Cedar.

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Cedar can be seen in this section.

DDR3L/LPDDR3
Memory type
no data
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Cedar, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

Technologies

The difference between Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Cedar is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Cedar. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1.103
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
2.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Cedar graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel UHD Graphics 615 or AMD Cedar good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 615
AMD Cedar
Death Stranding (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 615
AMD Cedar
F1 2020 (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 615
AMD Cedar
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 615
AMD Cedar
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 615
AMD Cedar
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 615

4.76% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (192 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $518)

So, Intel UHD Graphics 615 or AMD Cedar?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics 615 .

Intel UHD Graphics 615 versus AMD Cedar performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 615
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cedar