Intel HD Graphics 4000
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Intel HD Graphics 4000
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

880
Place in performance rating
159
no data
Value for money (0-100)
23.65
Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge
Architecture
GCN 1.2
Ivy Bridge GT2
Code name
Fiji
Laptop
Type
Desktop
23 March 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
10 September 2015 (6 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$649
$91
Price now
$577 (0.9x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
0.13
Value for money
16.46
Ivy Bridge
GPU code name
Fiji
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

128
Pipelines
4096
350 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1,200 million
Transistor count
8,900 million
22 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
175 Watt
20.80
Texture fill rate
256.0
33.6 gflops
Floating-point performance
8,192 gflops
no data
Compute units
64
16
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4096
1350 MHz
Boost clock speed
1000 MHz
1,200 million
Number of transistors
8,900 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
175 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
152 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Bridgeless CrossFire
1

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano can be seen in this section.

System Shared
Memory type
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
4096 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
500 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
512 GB/s
+
Shared memory
-
no data
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
+
no data
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
+

Technologies

The difference between Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
CrossFire
1
no data
FRTC
1
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
+
no data
LiquidVR
1
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TressFX
1
no data
TrueAudio
+
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
VCE
+
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-
+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.0
OpenGL
4.5
1.1.80
Vulkan
+
5.0
Shader Model
6.3
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel HD Graphics 4000 or AMD Radeon R9 Nano good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel HD Graphics 4000
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Death Stranding (2020) Intel HD Graphics 4000
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
F1 2020 (2020) Intel HD Graphics 4000
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel HD Graphics 4000
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel HD Graphics 4000
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 4000

Cheaper ($91 vs $577 (0.9x MSRP))

Finer manufacturing process technology (22 nm vs 28 nm)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano

52.48% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (4096 vs 128)

So, Intel HD Graphics 4000 or AMD Radeon R9 Nano?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 Nano .

Intel HD Graphics 4000 versus AMD Radeon R9 Nano performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

1.7 Out of 3 CpusData Score Intel HD Graphics 4000
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 Nano