AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M600M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and NVIDIA Quadro M600M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

411
Place in performance rating
455
no data
Value for money (0-100)
21.44
Vega
Architecture
Maxwell
Vega Raven Ridge
Code name
GM107
Laptop
Type
Mobile workstation
26 October 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
2 October 2015 (6 years ago)
no data
Price now
$103
no data
Value for money
14.50
Vega Raven Ridge
GPU code name
GM107
Laptop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and NVIDIA Quadro M600M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

512
Pipelines
384
no data
Core clock speed
837 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,870 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
14.02
no data
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
1200 MHz
Boost clock speed
876 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
1,870 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
30 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and NVIDIA Quadro M600M.

no data
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and NVIDIA Quadro M600M can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and NVIDIA Quadro M600M, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Display Port
1.2

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and NVIDIA Quadro M600M is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
5.0
no data
Optimus
+
no data
3D Vision Pro
+
no data
Mosaic
+
no data
nView Display Management
+
no data
nView
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and NVIDIA Quadro M600M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 12_1
DirectX
12
no data
OpenGL
4.5
no data
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
5.0
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and NVIDIA Quadro M600M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or NVIDIA Quadro M600M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 62.1 20.8 13.9
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 43 22 20 15
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

1.71% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (512 vs 384)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M600M

There is no accountable advantage

So, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or NVIDIA Quadro M600M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) .

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) versus NVIDIA Quadro M600M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro M600M