AMD Radeon R7 M350
VS
AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R7 M350
VS
AMD Cayman

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R7 M350 and AMD Cayman. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

641
Place in performance rating
not rated
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Opal
Code name
Cayman
Desktop
Type
Desktop
2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
no data
no data
Price now
$17.44
Opal
GPU code name
Cayman
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R7 M350 and AMD Cayman based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
1536
725 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
825 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
950 million
Transistor count
2,640 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
35 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
19.80
Texture fill rate
no data
779.5 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
6
Compute units
no data
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1536
825 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
950 million
Number of transistors
2,640 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R7 M350 and AMD Cayman.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R7 M350 and AMD Cayman can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
no data
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1000 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R7 M350 and AMD Cayman, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data
1
Eyefinity
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R7 M350 and AMD Cayman is the additional functionality.

-
AppAcceleration
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
+
PowerTune
no data
-
TrueAudio
no data
+
ZeroCore
no data
-
Enduro
no data
1
DualGraphics
no data
1
Switchable graphics
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R7 M350 and AMD Cayman. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
5.1
Shader Model
no data
Not Listed
OpenCL
no data
+
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 M350 and AMD Cayman graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 M350 or AMD Cayman good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 M350
AMD Cayman
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 M350
AMD Cayman
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 M350
AMD Cayman
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 M350
AMD Cayman
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 M350
AMD Cayman
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 M350

4.81% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of AMD Cayman

More pipelines (1536 vs 384)

So, AMD Radeon R7 M350 or AMD Cayman?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 M350 .

AMD Radeon R7 M350 versus AMD Cayman performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 M350
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cayman