AMD Radeon R5 M320
VS
AMD Radeon HD 6770
AMD Radeon R5 M320
VS
AMD Radeon HD 6770

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R5 M320 and AMD Radeon HD 6770. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

904
Place in performance rating
588
no data
Value for money (0-100)
18.49
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Jet
Code name
Juniper
Laptop
Type
Desktop
7 May 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
21 January 2011 (10 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$129
no data
Price now
$206 (1.6x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
no data
Value for money
0.59
Exo UL/ULT/ULP
GPU code name
Juniper
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R5 M320 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

320
Pipelines
800
855 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
855 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
690 million
Transistor count
1,040 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
108 Watt
17.10
Texture fill rate
34.00
547.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,360.0 gflops
5
Compute units
no data
320
Pipelines / CUDA cores
800
855 MHz
Boost clock speed
900 MHz
690 million
Number of transistors
1,040 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
108 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R5 M320 and AMD Radeon HD 6770.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
198 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
PCIe 2.0 x16

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R5 M320 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1050 MHz
16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R5 M320 and AMD Radeon HD 6770, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
1
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
-

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R5 M320 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 is the additional functionality.

-
AppAcceleration
-
no data
CrossFire
1
+
HD3D
-
+
PowerTune
-
-
TrueAudio
-
+
ZeroCore
-
-
Enduro
-
1
DualGraphics
no data
1
Switchable graphics
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R5 M320 and AMD Radeon HD 6770. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
DirectX® 11
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
+
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
Not Listed
OpenCL
1.2
+
Mantle
-

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R5 M320 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R5 M320 or AMD Radeon HD 6770 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R5 M320
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R5 M320
AMD Radeon HD 6770
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R5 M320
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R5 M320
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R5 M320
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 M320

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 1 GB)

Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 6770

3.81% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (800 vs 320)

More memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s vs 16 GB/s)

So, AMD Radeon R5 M320 or AMD Radeon HD 6770?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon HD 6770 .

AMD Radeon R5 M320 versus AMD Radeon HD 6770 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R5 M320
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon HD 6770