AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
VS
AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
VS
AMD Radeon R7 250

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon R7 250. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

89
Place in performance rating
599
8.55
Value for money (0-100)
22.79
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN
Vega 10
Code name
Oland
Workstation
Type
Desktop
10 July 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
1 October 2013 (8 years ago)
$1,599
Launch price (MSRP)
$89
$2337 (1.5x MSRP)
Price now
$117 (1.3x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
11.31
Value for money
1.00
Vega 10
GPU code name
Oland XT
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon R7 250 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

4096
Pipelines
384
1200 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
12,500 million
Transistor count
950 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
230 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
384.0
Texture fill rate
25.20
12,288 gflops
Floating-point performance
716.8 gflops
4096
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
1500 MHz
Boost clock speed
1050 MHz
12,500 million
Number of transistors
950 million
230 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon R7 250.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
267 mm
Length
168 mm
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
N/A
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon R7 250 can be seen in this section.

HBM2
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR5
16 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2048 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1890 MHz
Memory clock speed
1150 MHz
483.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon R7 250, the size and number of monitors.

6x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
-

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon R7 250 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
CrossFire
1
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
-
no data
PowerTune
-
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
-
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon R7 250. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2
no data
Mantle
-

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon R7 250 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 or AMD Radeon R7 250 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
AMD Radeon R7 250
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
AMD Radeon R7 250
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
AMD Radeon R7 250
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
AMD Radeon R7 250
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
AMD Radeon R7 250
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

49.09% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (4096 vs 384)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (16 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (483.8 GB/s vs 72 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250

Cheaper ($117 (1.3x MSRP) vs $2337 (1.5x MSRP))

Less power consumption (75 Watt vs 230 Watt)

So, AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 or AMD Radeon R7 250?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 .

AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 versus AMD Radeon R7 250 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 250