AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M5000
AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M5000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro M5000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
139
no data
Value for money (0-100)
16.29
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Cedar
Code name
GM204
Desktop
Type
Workstation
no data
Release date
29 June 2015 (6 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$2,856.99
$17.81
Price now
$993 (0.3x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
14.45
Cedar
GPU code name
GM204
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

80
Pipelines
2048
no data
Core clock speed
861 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
5,200 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
132.9
no data
Floating-point performance
4,252 gflops
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
2048
no data
Boost clock speed
1038 MHz
292 million
Number of transistors
5,200 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro M5000.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
no data
SLI options
+
no data
Width
2" (5.1 cm)

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
256 Bit
no data
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro M5000, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
no data
Number of simultaneous displays
4
no data
Multi-display synchronization
Quadro Sync

Technologies

The difference between AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
5.2
no data
3D Vision Pro
+
no data
Mosaic
+
no data
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
+
no data
High-Performance Video I/O6
+
no data
nView Desktop Management
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro M5000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12
4.4
OpenGL
4.5
no data
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
5
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro M5000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro M5000
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $993 (0.3x MSRP))

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M5000

43.57% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (2048 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro M5000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro M5000 .

AMD Cedar versus NVIDIA Quadro M5000 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cedar
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro M5000