AMD Cedar
VS
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
AMD Cedar
VS
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cedar and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
709
no data
Value for money (0-100)
7.21
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Terascale 1
Cedar
Code name
M96
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
9 January 2009 (12 years ago)
$17.81
Price now
$143
no data
Value for money
0.33
Cedar
GPU code name
M96-XT
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cedar and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

80
Pipelines
320
no data
Core clock speed
675 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
514 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
21.60
no data
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
292 million
Number of transistors
514 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cedar and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670.

no data
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cedar and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cedar and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between AMD Cedar and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is the additional functionality.

no data
PowerPlay
+
no data
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI
+
no data
PCI-E 2.0 x16
+
no data
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports
+
no data
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cedar and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $143)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

Advantages of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

3.33% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (320 vs 80)

So, AMD Cedar or ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 .

AMD Cedar versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cedar
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670