AMD Cedar
VS
AMD FirePro W7000
AMD Cedar
VS
AMD FirePro W7000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro W7000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
287
no data
Value for money (0-100)
18.08
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Cedar
Code name
Pitcairn
Desktop
Type
Workstation
no data
Release date
13 June 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$899
$17.81
Price now
$298 (0.3x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
7.09
Cedar
GPU code name
Pitcairn
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro W7000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

80
Pipelines
1280
no data
Core clock speed
950 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
2,800 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
76.00
no data
Floating-point performance
2,432 gflops
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1280
292 million
Number of transistors
2,800 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
350 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro W7000.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
242 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro W7000 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
4800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro W7000, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
no data
StereoOutput3D
1
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
4

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro W7000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and AMD FirePro W7000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or AMD FirePro W7000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD FirePro W7000
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD FirePro W7000
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD FirePro W7000
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD FirePro W7000
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD FirePro W7000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $298 (0.3x MSRP))

Advantages of AMD FirePro W7000

19.52% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1280 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cedar or AMD FirePro W7000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W7000 .

AMD Cedar versus AMD FirePro W7000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cedar
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W7000