AMD Cayman
VS
AMD FirePro S9050
AMD Cayman
VS
AMD FirePro S9050

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cayman and AMD FirePro S9050. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
308
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.12
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Cayman
Code name
Tahiti
Desktop
Type
Workstation
no data
Release date
7 August 2014 (7 years ago)
$17.44
Price now
$550
no data
Value for money
4.40
Cayman
GPU code name
Tahiti
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cayman and AMD FirePro S9050 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1536
Pipelines
1792
no data
Core clock speed
900 MHz
2,640 million
Transistor count
4,313 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
100.8
no data
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1792
2,640 million
Number of transistors
4,313 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
225 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cayman and AMD FirePro S9050.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
254 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cayman and AMD FirePro S9050 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
no data
Memory bus width
384 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cayman and AMD FirePro S9050, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cayman and AMD FirePro S9050. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cayman and AMD FirePro S9050 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cayman or AMD FirePro S9050 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD FirePro S9050
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD FirePro S9050
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD FirePro S9050
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD FirePro S9050
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD FirePro S9050
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cayman

Cheaper ($17.44 vs $550)

Advantages of AMD FirePro S9050

0.09% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1792 vs 1536)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cayman or AMD FirePro S9050?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro S9050 .

AMD Cayman versus AMD FirePro S9050 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cayman
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro S9050