Ranking AMD
Ranking wydajności kart graficznych AMD. W tabeli przedstawiono główne cechy chipów do porównania i wyniki benchmarków.
№ | Karty graficzne | Typ | Performance | Architektura | Year | Aktualna cena | Power consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
121 |
![]() |
![]() |
14.05 | GCN 4.0 | 2016 | 198 | 100 W |
122 |
![]() |
![]() |
13.96 | GCN 2.0 | 2014 | 170 | 50 W |
123 |
![]() |
![]() |
13.92 | GCN 1.0 | 2012 | 364 | 75 W |
124 |
![]() |
![]() |
13.78 | GCN 4.0 | 2017 | 192 | 65 W |
125 |
![]() |
![]() |
13.67 | TeraScale 3 | 2010 | 60 | 250 W |
126 |
![]() |
![]() |
13.58 | TeraScale 3 | 2011 | 160 | 375 W |
127 |
![]() |
![]() |
13.4 | GCN 2.0 | 2015 | 50 W | |
128 |
![]() |
![]() |
13.39 | GCN 2.0 | 2013 | 90 | 95 W |
129 |
![]() |
![]() |
13.21 | GCN 5.0 | 2018 | 300 W | |
130 |
![]() |
![]() |
13.06 | RDNA 1.0 | 2020 | 85 W | |
131 |
![]() |
![]() |
12.91 | Polaris | 2017 | 65 W | |
132 |
![]() |
![]() |
12.85 | TeraScale 3 | 2010 | 262 | 200 W |
133 |
![]() |
![]() |
12.73 | TeraScale 3 | 2011 | 240 | 150 W |
134 |
![]() |
![]() |
12.64 | TeraScale 2 | 2011 | 100 W | |
135 |
![]() |
![]() |
12.64 | Vega | 2017 | − | |
136 |
![]() |
![]() |
12.61 | GCN 4.0 | 2016 | 35 W | |
137 |
![]() |
![]() |
12.52 | Vega | 2020 | − | |
138 |
![]() |
![]() |
12.25 | GCN 1.0 | 2013 | 445 | 150 W |
139 |
![]() |
![]() |
11.73 | TeraScale 2 | 2011 | 254 W | |
140 |
![]() |
![]() |
11.71 | TeraScale 2 | 2010 | 225 W |