Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
Tesla M1060
Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
Tesla M1060

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla M1060. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

687
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
1 June 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,699
$1429
Price now
$175 (0.1x MSRP)
0.58
Value for money
no data
no data
GPU code name
GT200B
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla M1060 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Core clock speed
610 MHz
7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
48.80
no data
Floating-point performance
622.1 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
240
no data
Number of transistors
1,400 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
188 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla M1060.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla M1060 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
512 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla M1060, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla M1060 is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
1.3

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla M1060. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 12
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
no data
OpenGL
3.3
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.0
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla M1060 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Tesla M1060 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Tesla M1060
Death Stranding (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Tesla M1060
F1 2020 (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Tesla M1060
Gears Tactics (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Tesla M1060
Doom Eternal (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Tesla M1060
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 685

4.32% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 55 nm)

Advantages of Tesla M1060

Cheaper ($175 (0.1x MSRP) vs $1429)

So, Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Tesla M1060?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Qualcomm Adreno 685 .

Qualcomm Adreno 685 versus Tesla M1060 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Qualcomm Adreno 685
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Tesla M1060