NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

16
Place in performance rating
956
5.29
Value for money (0-100)
5.26
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TU102
Code name
G71
Workstation
Type
Workstation
13 August 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
22 May 2006 (15 years ago)
$6,299
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,599
$5455 (0.9x MSRP)
Price now
$228 (0.1x MSRP)
5.06
Value for money
0.03
TU102
GPU code name
G71
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

4608
Pipelines
no data
1440 MHz
Core clock speed
450 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
18,600 million
Transistor count
278 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
90 nm
260 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
80 Watt
509.8
Texture fill rate
9.000
4608
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1770 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
18,600 million
Number of transistors
278 million
260 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
80 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
267 mm
Length
173 mm
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 can be seen in this section.

GDDR6
Memory type
GDDR3
24 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
14000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1320 MHz
672.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
42.24 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500, the size and number of monitors.

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 Ultimate (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

87.83% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 90 nm)

More memory bandwidth (672.0 GB/s vs 42.24 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500

Cheaper ($228 (0.1x MSRP) vs $5455 (0.9x MSRP))

Less power consumption (80 Watt vs 260 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 24 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 .

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500