NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

872
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.16
G9x
Architecture
Rankine
G92
Code name
NV34 B1
Mobile workstation
Type
Workstation
23 February 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
28 October 2003 (18 years ago)
$80
Price now
$93
0.15
Value for money
no data
NB8E-GLM
GPU code name
NV34 B1
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

64
Pipelines
no data
500 MHz
Core clock speed
275 MHz
754 million
Transistor count
45 million
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
150 nm
70 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
13 Watt
16.00
Texture fill rate
1.100
160 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
754 million
Number of transistors
45 million
70 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
13 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI.

MXM-HE
Interface
PCI
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
64 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
500 MHz
51.14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DMS-59

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI is the additional functionality.

+
PCI-E 16x
no data
+
Gigathread technology
no data
+
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
no data
+
PowerMizer 7.0
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0a
3.3
OpenGL
1.5 (2.1)

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

2.12% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($80 vs $93)

Finer manufacturing process technology (65 nm vs 150 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 64 MB)

More memory bandwidth (51.14 GB/s vs 8 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI

Less power consumption (13 Watt vs 70 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M versus NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI