NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon R7 265
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon R7 265

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon R7 265. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GF116
Code name
Pitcairn
Desktop
Type
Desktop
15 March 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
13 February 2014 (7 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$149
no data
Price now
$600 (4x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
GF116
GPU code name
Pitcairn
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon R7 265 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
1024
783 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
no data
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1,170 million
Transistor count
2,800 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
106 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
25.06
Texture fill rate
59.20
601.3 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,894 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1024
no data
Boost clock speed
925 MHz
1,170 million
Number of transistors
2,800 million
106 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon R7 265.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
210 mm
Length
210 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon R7 265 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
3608 MHz
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
57.73 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon R7 265, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
1
+
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
-

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon R7 265 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
CrossFire
1
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
-
no data
PowerTune
-
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
-
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon R7 265. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2
no data
Mantle
-

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon R7 265 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 or AMD Radeon R7 265 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon R7 265
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon R7 265
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon R7 265
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon R7 265
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon R7 265
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

Less power consumption (106 Watt vs 150 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265

More pipelines (1024 vs 192)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (179.2 GB/s vs 57.73 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 or AMD Radeon R7 265?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 .

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 versus AMD Radeon R7 265 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 265