NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

1725
Place in performance rating
not rated
0.41
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GK208
Code name
Vega 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
29 May 2013
Release date
7 August 2017 (4 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$699
$66
Price now
$246 (0.4x MSRP)
no data
GPU code name
Vega 10
no data
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
4096
902 MHz
Core clock speed
1408 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1668 MHz
915 million
Transistor count
12,500 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
25 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
345 Watt
28.86
Texture fill rate
427.0
692.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
14,336 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4096
no data
Boost clock speed
1668 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
12,500 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
345 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling.

PCIe 2.0 x8
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
145 mm
Length
282 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
2x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
HBM2
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
2048 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
1890 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
483.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
no data
HDMI
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 or AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

1.11% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($66 vs $246 (0.4x MSRP))

Less power consumption (25 Watt vs 345 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

More pipelines (4096 vs 384)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (483.8 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 or AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 .

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling