Intel UHD Graphics 620
VS
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Intel UHD Graphics 620
VS
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema). Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

639
Place in performance rating
935
Gen. 9.5
Architecture
GCN 1.1
Kaby Lake GT2
Code name
Beema/Mullins
Laptop
Type
Laptop
1 September 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
29 April 2014 (7 years ago)
$706
Price now
no data
1.06
Value for money
no data
Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2
GPU code name
Beema/Mullins
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
128
300 MHz
Core clock speed
350 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
686 MHz
189 million
Transistor count
no data
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
27.60
Texture fill rate
no data
24
Pipelines / CUDA cores
128
1150 MHz
Boost clock speed
686 MHz
189 million
Number of transistors
no data
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema).

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) can be seen in this section.

LPDDR3/DDR4
Memory type
no data
32 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema), the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

Technologies

The difference between Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema). Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.0
4.6
OpenGL
no data
1.1.103
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
2.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel UHD Graphics 620 or AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 620
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Death Stranding (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 620
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
F1 2020 (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 620 29.2 13.5 10.2
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 620 31.2 10.7
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 620
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 620

3.76% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (192 vs 128)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel UHD Graphics 620 or AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics 620 .

Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 620
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)