ATI Radeon X1050
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630
ATI Radeon X1050
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards ATI Radeon X1050 and Intel UHD Graphics 630. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
597
Rage 9
Architecture
Gen. 9.5
no data
Code name
Comet Lake GT2
no data
Type
Desktop
7 December 2006 (14 years ago)
Release date
1 October 2017 (4 years ago)
$25
Price now
$1009
no data
Value for money
1.00
RV370
GPU code name
Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between ATI Radeon X1050 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
184
400 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
no data
Transistor count
189 million
110 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
1.600
Texture fill rate
26.45
no data
Floating-point performance
460.8 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
24
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
107 million
Number of transistors
189 million
24 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the ATI Radeon X1050 and Intel UHD Graphics 630.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics ATI Radeon X1050 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 can be seen in this section.

DDR2
Memory type
System Shared
128 MB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
64 Bit
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
666 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
5.328 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards ATI Radeon X1050 and Intel UHD Graphics 630, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between ATI Radeon X1050 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is ATI Radeon X1050 and Intel UHD Graphics 630. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

no data
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.5
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI Radeon X1050 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI Radeon X1050 or Intel UHD Graphics 630 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI Radeon X1050
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Death Stranding (2020) ATI Radeon X1050
Intel UHD Graphics 630
F1 2020 (2020) ATI Radeon X1050
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI Radeon X1050
Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI Radeon X1050
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of ATI Radeon X1050

43.48% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($25 vs $1009)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 110 nm)

So, ATI Radeon X1050 or Intel UHD Graphics 630?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Radeon X1050 .

ATI Radeon X1050 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI Radeon X1050
5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 630