AMD Radeon R9 280
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMD Radeon R9 280
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

237
Place in performance rating
151
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
Tahiti
Code name
TU116
Desktop
Type
Laptop
4 March 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
23 April 2019 (2 years ago)
$279
Launch price (MSRP)
$229
$305 (1.1x MSRP)
Price now
$1037 (4.5x MSRP)
reference
Design
no data
10.12
Value for money
10.96
Tahiti
GPU code name
N18E-G0
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1792
Pipelines
1536
no data
Core clock speed
1140 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
4,313 million
Transistor count
6,600 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
200 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
104.5
Texture fill rate
128.2
3,344 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
1792
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1536
933 MHz
Boost clock speed
1335 MHz
4,313 million
Number of transistors
6,600 million
200 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
275 mm
Length
no data
1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
medium sized
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR6
3 GB
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
192 Bit
1250 MHz
Memory clock speed
12000 MHz
240 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs
1
Eyefinity
no data
+
HDMI
no data
-
DisplayPort support
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is the additional functionality.

-
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
1
LiquidVR
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
1
TressFX
no data
+
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data
+
UVD
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 280 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280

Cheaper ($305 (1.1x MSRP) vs $1037 (4.5x MSRP))

More pipelines (1792 vs 1536)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

16.86% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 3 GB)

More memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s vs 240 GB/s)

So, AMD Radeon R9 280 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q .

AMD Radeon R9 280 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 280
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q