AMD Radeon R7 350
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
AMD Radeon R7 350
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
178
0.08
Value for money (0-100)
56.48
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
Cape Verde
Code name
TU117
Desktop
Type
Desktop
6 July 2016 (5 years ago)
Release date
23 April 2019 (2 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$149
$12.88
Price now
$586 (3.9x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
22.33
Cape Verde
GPU code name
TU117
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

512
Pipelines
896
800 MHz
Core clock speed
1485 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1,500 million
Transistor count
4,700 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
55 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
25.60
Texture fill rate
93.24
819.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
896
no data
Boost clock speed
1665 MHz
1,500 million
Number of transistors
4,700 million
55 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
168 mm
Length
229 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
4500 MHz
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
72 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
+
HDMI
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 350 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 259.1 95.8 62.2 39.4 26 14.4
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 163 90.2 77.2 69.5 40.3 20.8
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 350

Cheaper ($12.88 vs $586 (3.9x MSRP))

Less power consumption (55 Watt vs 75 Watt)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

36.35% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (896 vs 512)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (128.0 GB/s vs 72 GB/s)

So, AMD Radeon R7 350 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 .

AMD Radeon R7 350 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 350
5.0 Out of 3 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650