AMD Radeon Pro SSG
VS
AMD Radeon R9 390
AMD Radeon Pro SSG
VS
AMD Radeon R9 390

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon R9 390. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

116
Place in performance rating
148
no data
Value for money (0-100)
19.18
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Vega 10
Code name
Grenada
Workstation
Type
Desktop
8 August 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
18 June 2015 (6 years ago)
$6,999
Launch price (MSRP)
$329
$1499 (0.2x MSRP)
Price now
$320 (1x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
15.14
Value for money
31.34
Vega 10
GPU code name
Grenada
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon R9 390 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

4096
Pipelines
2560
1440 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
12,500 million
Transistor count
6,200 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
350 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
275 Watt
384.0
Texture fill rate
160.0
12,288 gflops
Floating-point performance
5,120 gflops
4096
Pipelines / CUDA cores
2560
1500 MHz
Boost clock speed
1000 MHz
12,500 million
Number of transistors
6,200 million
350 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
275 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon R9 390.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
267 mm
Length
275 mm
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Bridgeless CrossFire
1

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon R9 390 can be seen in this section.

HBM2
Memory type
GDDR5
16 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
2048 Bit
Memory bus width
512 Bit
1890 MHz
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
483.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
384 GB/s
no data
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon R9 390, the size and number of monitors.

6x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
1
no data
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
+

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon R9 390 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
CrossFire
1
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
-
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
+
no data
ZeroCore
-
no data
VCE
+
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon R9 390. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
6.3
no data
OpenCL
2.0
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon R9 390 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Pro SSG or AMD Radeon R9 390 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Pro SSG
AMD Radeon R9 390
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Pro SSG
AMD Radeon R9 390
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Pro SSG
AMD Radeon R9 390
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Pro SSG
AMD Radeon R9 390
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Pro SSG
AMD Radeon R9 390
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro SSG

8.33% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (4096 vs 2560)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More memory bandwidth (483.8 GB/s vs 384 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390

Cheaper ($320 (1x MSRP) vs $1499 (0.2x MSRP))

Less power consumption (275 Watt vs 350 Watt)

So, AMD Radeon Pro SSG or AMD Radeon R9 390?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro SSG .

AMD Radeon Pro SSG versus AMD Radeon R9 390 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon Pro SSG
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 390