AMD Cypress
VS
AMD Radeon R7 250X
AMD Cypress
VS
AMD Radeon R7 250X

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cypress and AMD Radeon R7 250X. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
445
no data
Value for money (0-100)
9.94
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Cypress
Code name
Cape Verde
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
13 February 2014 (7 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$99
$12.72
Price now
$229 (2.3x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
no data
Value for money
2.33
Cypress
GPU code name
Cape Verde
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cypress and AMD Radeon R7 250X based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1600
Pipelines
640
no data
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
2,154 million
Transistor count
1,500 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
80 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
38.00
no data
Floating-point performance
1,216 gflops
1600
Pipelines / CUDA cores
640
no data
Boost clock speed
1000 MHz
2,154 million
Number of transistors
1,500 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
80 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cypress and AMD Radeon R7 250X.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
210 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cypress and AMD Radeon R7 250X can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1625 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cypress and AMD Radeon R7 250X, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
1
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
-

Technologies

The difference between AMD Cypress and AMD Radeon R7 250X is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
CrossFire
1
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
-
no data
PowerTune
-
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
-
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cypress and AMD Radeon R7 250X. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2
no data
Mantle
-

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cypress and AMD Radeon R7 250X graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cypress or AMD Radeon R7 250X good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cypress
AMD Radeon R7 250X
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cypress
AMD Radeon R7 250X
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cypress
AMD Radeon R7 250X
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cypress
AMD Radeon R7 250X
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cypress
AMD Radeon R7 250X
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cypress

Cheaper ($12.72 vs $229 (2.3x MSRP))

More pipelines (1600 vs 640)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250X

10.47% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cypress or AMD Radeon R7 250X?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 250X .

AMD Cypress versus AMD Radeon R7 250X performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cypress
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 250X