AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K4200

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro K4200. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
284
no data
Value for money (0-100)
20.19
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
Cedar
Code name
GK104
Desktop
Type
Workstation
no data
Release date
22 July 2014 (7 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$854.99
$17.81
Price now
$383 (0.4x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
7.44
Cedar
GPU code name
GK104
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

80
Pipelines
1344
no data
Core clock speed
771 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
784 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
3,540 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
108 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
87.81
no data
Floating-point performance
2,107 gflops
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1344
no data
Boost clock speed
784 MHz
292 million
Number of transistors
3,540 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
108 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro K4200.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
241 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
172.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro K4200, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro K4200. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro K4200 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $383 (0.4x MSRP))

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K4200

20.62% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1344 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro K4200?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K4200 .

AMD Cedar versus NVIDIA Quadro K4200 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cedar
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K4200