AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Value for money (0-100)
4.76
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
Caicos
Code name
G84
Desktop
Type
Workstation
no data
Release date
12 September 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$699
$10.38
Price now
$190 (0.3x MSRP)
Caicos
GPU code name
G84
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

160
Pipelines
32
no data
Core clock speed
460 MHz
370 million
Transistor count
289 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
42 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
7.360
no data
Floating-point performance
58.88 gflops
160
Pipelines / CUDA cores
32
370 million
Number of transistors
289 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
42 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700.

no data
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
DDR2
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Caicos or NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Caicos

Cheaper ($10.38 vs $190 (0.3x MSRP))

More pipelines (160 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 80 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

1.54% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Caicos or NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 .

AMD Caicos versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Caicos
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700