18800-1
VS
Tesla A100
18800-1
VS
Tesla A100

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards 18800-1 and Tesla A100. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
Wonder
Architecture
Ampere
no data
Release date
no data
18800-1
GPU code name
GA100
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between 18800-1 and Tesla A100 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Core clock speed
1110 MHz
800 nm
Manufacturing process technology
7 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
550.6
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
7936
no data
Number of transistors
38,000 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
260 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the 18800-1 and Tesla A100.

no data
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics 18800-1 and Tesla A100 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
HBM2e
no data
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
no data
Memory bus width
4096 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
2400 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
1,229 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards 18800-1 and Tesla A100, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The difference in supported APIs is 18800-1 and Tesla A100. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
no data
N/A
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for 18800-1 and Tesla A100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the 18800-1 or Tesla A100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 18800-1
Tesla A100
Death Stranding (2020) 18800-1
Tesla A100
F1 2020 (2020) 18800-1
Tesla A100
Gears Tactics (2020) 18800-1
Tesla A100
Doom Eternal (2020) 18800-1
Tesla A100
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of 18800-1

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of Tesla A100

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 800 nm)

So, 18800-1 or Tesla A100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend 18800-1 .

18800-1 versus Tesla A100 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score 18800-1
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Tesla A100