NVIDIA Quadro 2000
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and Intel UHD Graphics 630. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

671
Place in performance rating
597
10.74
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Fermi
Architecture
Gen. 9.5
GF106
Code name
Comet Lake GT2
Workstation
Type
Desktop
24 December 2010 (10 years ago)
Release date
1 October 2017 (4 years ago)
$599
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$89 (0.1x MSRP)
Price now
$1009
0.69
Value for money
1.00
GF106
GPU code name
Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
184
625 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1,170 million
Transistor count
189 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
62 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
20.00
Texture fill rate
26.45
480.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
460.8 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
24
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
1,170 million
Number of transistors
189 million
62 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and Intel UHD Graphics 630.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
178 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
System Shared
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
2600 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
41.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and Intel UHD Graphics 630, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and Intel UHD Graphics 630. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.5
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro 2000 or Intel UHD Graphics 630 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Intel UHD Graphics 630
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Cheaper ($89 (0.1x MSRP) vs $1009)

More pipelines (192 vs 184)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630

1.17% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 62 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro 2000 or Intel UHD Graphics 630?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics 630 .

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro 2000
5.0 Out of 2 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 630