General info
The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.
Technical specs
Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M.
Memory
Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M can be seen in this section.
Video outputs and ports
The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, the size and number of monitors.
Technologies
The difference between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M is the additional functionality.
API support
The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or AMD Radeon Pro 5600M good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | ||||||
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | ||||||
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | ||||||
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | ||||||
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | |||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | ||||||
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags. |
| May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags. | |
| 30 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps) |
| 40 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps) |
| 60 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps) |
| May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game. | |
| ? | Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation. |
| Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible. | |
| The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results. | |
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
23.98% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (3072 vs 2560)
More maximum RAM amount (16 GB vs 8 GB)
More memory bandwidth (448.0 GB/s vs 394.2 GB/s)
G-SYNC support
VR Ready
Multi Monitor
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 12 nm)
Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 110 Watt)
So, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or AMD Radeon Pro 5600M?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile .
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon Pro 5600M performance benchmarks comparison
User rating
