AMD Radeon R9 270X
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
AMD Radeon R9 270X
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

258
Place in performance rating
1047
36.84
Value for money (0-100)
1.41
GCN
Architecture
G8x
Curacao
Code name
G84
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
8 October 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
1 June 2007 (14 years ago)
$199
Launch price (MSRP)
$149.90
$327 (1.6x MSRP)
Price now
$212 (1.4x MSRP)
reference
Design
no data
6.66
Value for money
no data
Curacao XT
GPU code name
NB8P-GLM
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1280
Pipelines
32
no data
Core clock speed
625 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
2,800 million
Transistor count
289 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
180 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
84.00
Texture fill rate
10.00
2,688 gflops
Floating-point performance
80 gflops
1280
Pipelines / CUDA cores
32
1050 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
2,800 million
Number of transistors
289 million
180 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
50 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
MXM-HE
2 x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
large
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
179.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs
+
Eyefinity
no data
+
HDMI
no data
+
DisplayPort support
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M is the additional functionality.

+
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
1
LiquidVR
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
1
TressFX
no data
+
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data
+
UVD
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
+
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 270X or NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 270X
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 270X
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 270X
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 270X
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 270X
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 270X

21.53% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1280 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 80 nm)

More memory bandwidth (179.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Cheaper ($212 (1.4x MSRP) vs $327 (1.6x MSRP))

Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 180 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 2 GB)

So, AMD Radeon R9 270X or NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 270X .

AMD Radeon R9 270X versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 270X
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M