General info
The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.
Technical specs
Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile.
Memory
Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile can be seen in this section.
Video outputs and ports
The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, the size and number of monitors.
API support
The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 88 | 54 | 45.5 | 34 | 24 | 15 | |
| Death Stranding (2020) | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 107.95 | 63.5 | 58.05 | 56.9 | 36 | 17.8 | |
| F1 2020 (2020) | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 195 | 109 | 86 | 60 | 44 | 23 | |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 230.8 | 94 | 64.7 | 46.15 | 29.9 | 14.6 | |
| Doom Eternal (2020) | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 150.05 | 83 | 65.35 | ||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags. |
| May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags. | |
| 30 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps) |
| 40 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps) |
| 60 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps) |
| May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game. | |
| ? | Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation. |
| Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible. | |
| The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results. | |
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5700
23.27% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (2304 vs 1024)
Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 12 nm)
More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 4 GB)
More memory bandwidth (384.0 GB/s vs 192.0 GB/s)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Cheaper ($301 vs $1200)
Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 130 Watt)
So, AMD Radeon Pro 5700 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro 5700 .
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile performance benchmarks comparison
User rating
