AMD Cayman
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M6000
AMD Cayman
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M6000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro M6000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
113
no data
Value for money (0-100)
13.22
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Cayman
Code name
GM200
Desktop
Type
Workstation
no data
Release date
21 March 2015 (6 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$4,199.99
$17.44
Price now
$1234 (0.3x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
14.45
Cayman
GPU code name
GM200
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1536
Pipelines
3072
no data
Core clock speed
988 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
2,640 million
Transistor count
8,000 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
250 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
213.9
no data
Floating-point performance
6,844 gflops
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
3072
no data
Boost clock speed
1114 MHz
2,640 million
Number of transistors
8,000 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
250 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro M6000.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
no data
Memory bus width
384 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
317.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro M6000, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro M6000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cayman or NVIDIA Quadro M6000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cayman
NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cayman
NVIDIA Quadro M6000
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cayman
NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cayman
NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cayman
NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cayman

Cheaper ($17.44 vs $1234 (0.3x MSRP))

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M6000

55.75% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (3072 vs 1536)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cayman or NVIDIA Quadro M6000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro M6000 .

AMD Cayman versus NVIDIA Quadro M6000 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cayman
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro M6000