AMD Cayman
VS
AMD Radeon R9 390X
AMD Cayman
VS
AMD Radeon R9 390X

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 390X. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
138
no data
Value for money (0-100)
18.93
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN
Cayman
Code name
Grenada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
16 June 2015 (6 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$429
$17.44
Price now
$750 (1.7x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
no data
Value for money
14.84
Cayman
GPU code name
Grenada XT
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 390X based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1536
Pipelines
2816
no data
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2,640 million
Transistor count
6,200 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
275 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
184.8
no data
Floating-point performance
5,914 gflops
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
2816
no data
Boost clock speed
1050 MHz
2,640 million
Number of transistors
6,200 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
275 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 390X.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
275 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Bridgeless CrossFire
1

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 390X can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Memory bus width
512 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1050 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
384 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-
no data
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 390X, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
+
no data
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
+

Technologies

The difference between AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 390X is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
CrossFire
1
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
-
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
+
no data
ZeroCore
-
no data
VCE
+
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 390X. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
6.3
no data
OpenCL
2.0
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 390X graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cayman or AMD Radeon R9 390X good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R9 390X
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R9 390X
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R9 390X
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R9 390X
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R9 390X
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cayman

Cheaper ($17.44 vs $750 (1.7x MSRP))

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390X

42.85% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (2816 vs 1536)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cayman or AMD Radeon R9 390X?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 390X .

AMD Cayman versus AMD Radeon R9 390X performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cayman
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 390X